Citadel vs egroupware vs SOGo

Citadel, EGroupware, and SOGo are all free, open-source, self-hosted groupware servers built for organizations that want to run their own email, calendar, and…

Citadel

Free / Open Source · From Free

Best for: Small teams or hobbyist admins who want a lightweight, all-in-one self-hosted messaging server (email, forums, wikis, IM) on modest hardware and are comfortable with its unique rooms-based interface.

egroupware

Freemium / Open Source · From Free (Community Edition); paid cloud plans from EUR 21.90/month

Best for: Teams that need groupware plus project management, CRM-style tracking, and file sharing in one open-source suite, with the option to skip self-hosting via EGroupware's own eCloud plans.

SOGo

open-source · From Free

Best for: IT teams that want standards-based email, calendar, and contacts sync (CalDAV, CardDAV, ActiveSync) integrated with existing LDAP or Active Directory infrastructure at production scale.

At a Glance

 CitadelegroupwareSOGo
Primary categoryCollaborationCollaborationCollaboration
RatingNot documentedNot documentedNot documented
Pricing modelFree / Open SourceFreemium / Open Sourceopen-source
Starting priceFreeFree (Community Edition); paid cloud plans from EUR 21.90/monthFree
Free planNot documentedYesNot documented
Free trialNot documentedNot documentedNot documented
PlatformsWebWeb, iOS, AndroidWeb, iOS, Android
Team collaborationNot documentedNot documentedNot documented
AI featuresNot documentedYesNot documented
Public APIYesYesYes

Standout Differences

Broadest feature set

EGroupware bundles project management, InfoLog CRM-style tracking, integrated file management, and video conferencing integration on top of core groupware, going well beyond email and calendar.

egroupware

Standards-based sync

SOGo natively supports CalDAV, CardDAV, and Microsoft ActiveSync, giving it broad compatibility with Outlook, Thunderbird, and mobile mail clients out of the box.

SOGo

Longest operating history

Citadel's codebase dates back to 1987, giving it one of the longest continuously maintained histories among self-hosted messaging servers, written in C for a low-resource footprint.

Citadel

Deployment flexibility varies

EGroupware is the only one of the three with an official managed cloud edition (eCloud); Citadel and SOGo are self-hosted by default, though SOGo has an official commercial support partner in Alinto.

egroupware, SOGo, Citadel

Feature-by-Feature

Core Messaging

FeatureCitadelegroupwareSOGo
Email hostingAvailableAvailableAvailable
Shared calendarAvailableAvailableAvailable
CalDAV and CardDAV syncNot documentedNot documentedAvailable
Microsoft ActiveSync (mobile)Not documentedAvailableAvailable

Directory and Collaboration Extras

FeatureCitadelegroupwareSOGo
LDAP / Active Directory integrationNot documentedNot documentedAvailable
Project managementUnavailableAvailableUnavailable
Wikis, forums, and team chatAvailableAvailableUnavailable

Deployment and Support

FeatureCitadelegroupwareSOGo
Official managed cloud/SaaS optionUnavailableAvailableUnavailable
Commercial support availableUnavailableAvailableAvailable

Pricing Compared

Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.

Citadel

Open Source (Self-Hosted) — Free N/A

egroupware

Community Edition — Free N/A
eCloud — EUR 24.90/month Monthly, 2-user minimum
EPL Smart — From EUR 62.50/month Monthly, 10-user minimum
eFlat School — EUR 1,295/year Annual
Universal / eFlat — Custom (price on request) Annual

SOGo

Self-Hosted (Open Source) — Free N/A
Commercial Support (via Alinto) — Custom pricing Contract

Pros & Cons

Citadel

Pros

  • Completely free and open source under the GPL, with no paid tiers or vendor lock-in
  • Unifies email, forums, calendars, wikis, and messaging in one self-hosted server instead of many separate tools
  • Long, continuously maintained project history dating back decades, indicating stability of the core codebase
  • Written in C for a lean, low-resource footprint suitable for modest hardware

Cons

  • Requires self-hosting and server administration skills; there is no managed hosted version
  • Rooms-based architecture is a distinctive but unfamiliar paradigm for users coming from mainstream email/chat tools
  • No commercial support organization or SLA; support relies on documentation and community forums
  • Smaller active user and developer community compared to mainstream groupware platforms

egroupware

Pros

  • Fully-featured Community Edition is free and open source under the GPLv2 with no artificial limits
  • Can be self-hosted for full data control, or run as EU-hosted cloud SaaS
  • Broad feature set covering email, calendar, files, projects, and helpdesk in one suite
  • Modular design lets organizations enable only the apps they need

Cons

  • User interface feels dated compared to newer SaaS collaboration tools
  • Self-hosting requires ongoing server administration and update management
  • Enterprise-tier and cloud pricing require contacting sales or reading tiered per-user documentation
  • Smaller ecosystem and community than larger open-source rivals like Nextcloud

SOGo

Pros

  • Free and open source with no per-user licensing cost for the core server
  • Broad native client support through CalDAV, CardDAV, and ActiveSync
  • Integrates with existing LDAP, Active Directory, and IMAP infrastructure
  • Proven at scale in production environments with thousands of mailboxes
  • Active commercial steward (Alinto) available for organizations that want paid support

Cons

  • Requires in-house IT expertise or a paid support contract to install, secure, and maintain
  • Web interface looks dated compared to modern SaaS email clients
  • No official cloud-hosted SaaS version directly from the core project, only third-party hosting
  • Documentation can be technical and geared toward system administrators rather than end users

Use Cases

Choose Citadel: Small teams or hobbyist admins who want a lightweight, all-in-one self-hosted messaging server (email, forums, wikis, IM) on modest hardware and are comfortable with its unique rooms-based interface.
Choose egroupware: Teams that need groupware plus project management, CRM-style tracking, and file sharing in one open-source suite, with the option to skip self-hosting via EGroupware's own eCloud plans.
Choose SOGo: IT teams that want standards-based email, calendar, and contacts sync (CalDAV, CardDAV, ActiveSync) integrated with existing LDAP or Active Directory infrastructure at production scale.

Citadel

  • Self-hosted organizational groupware — Small organizations or communities run Citadel to get email, calendaring, and forums from one self-hosted server instead of separate tools.
  • Privacy-focused community hosting — Privacy-conscious operators use Citadel to run their own email and discussion infrastructure without relying on third-party SaaS providers.

egroupware

  • European data-sovereignty-conscious collaboration — Organizations that must keep email, calendar, and file data on EU soil use EGroupware's self-hosted or German-hosted cloud options instead of US-based SaaS suites.
  • Nonprofit and school administration — Nonprofits and schools use discounted eCloud NGO or flat-rate eFlat School plans to run email, scheduling, and file sharing on a fixed annual budget.
  • Self-hosted Microsoft 365 alternative — IT teams that already manage their own servers deploy the free Community Edition to replace proprietary groupware licensing costs.

SOGo

  • Self-Hosted Business Email — Small and mid-size businesses replace hosted email suites with a self-hosted SOGo server for full control over data and infrastructure.
  • ISP and Hosting Provider Webmail — Hosting providers deploy SOGo to offer webmail, calendar, and contact services to thousands of customer mailboxes across multiple domains.
  • Exchange Alternative for Regulated Industries — Organizations with data residency or compliance requirements use SOGo to keep email and calendar data on infrastructure they control.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which of Citadel, EGroupware, and SOGo is easiest to self-host?

Citadel is the leanest to run, being written in C for a low-resource footprint, while SOGo and EGroupware are more feature-rich but require more setup, such as configuring LDAP or Active Directory integration for SOGo, or enabling only the modules you need in EGroupware's modular suite.

Is there an official cloud-hosted option so I do not have to self-host?

EGroupware is the only one of the three with an official managed cloud edition, eCloud, starting at EUR 24.90 per month. Citadel and SOGo are self-hosted by default, though SOGo can be run through third-party hosting or with commercial support from Alinto.

Do these tools sync with Outlook and mobile devices?

SOGo explicitly supports CalDAV, CardDAV, and Microsoft ActiveSync plus Outlook and Thunderbird plugins. EGroupware includes mobile sync as a listed feature. Citadel's support for these specific sync standards is not detailed in available documentation.

Which tool is best if I also want project management or CRM features, not just email?

EGroupware, which includes InfoLog task and CRM-style tracking plus project management alongside core groupware. Citadel and SOGo are more narrowly focused on messaging and calendaring.

Can I get paid support if something breaks?

SOGo has an official commercial support partner, Alinto. EGroupware's paid cloud and enterprise tiers typically include support. Citadel has no commercial support organization, relying on documentation and community forums.

How mature are these three projects?

Citadel is the oldest, dating to 1987, followed by EGroupware (2003) and SOGo (2004). All three have long, continuously maintained histories as self-hosted groupware options.

Read the full Citadel review · Read the full egroupware review · Read the full SOGo review