Celoxis vs Hive vs Teamwork

Celoxis

Subscription · From $10/user/month

Best for: PMOs and enterprises wanting deep analytics, resource management, and the option of on-premise deployment.

Hive

Freemium · From Free; paid plans from $5/user/month

Best for: Teams that want flexible project views paired with native chat and an AI assistant at accessible per-user pricing.

Teamwork

freemium · From Free (paid plans from $9.99/user/month billed yearly)

Best for: Agencies and client-services teams that need project management bundled with time tracking, budgeting, and client billing and invoicing.

Celoxis

Hive

Teamwork

Celoxis

Pros

• Rare dual cloud/on-premise deployment option among modern project management tools
• Deep analytics with trend analysis and what-if scenario modeling
• Two decades of operating history with Fortune 500 and PMO customers
• Granular per-role pricing (Team-Member, Timesheet users) can lower cost for mixed teams

Cons

• Five full-access-user minimum makes it less accessible for very small teams
• Interface and reporting depth can have a steeper learning curve than lighter task-management tools
• Advanced features like risk tracking, billing, and client portal require upgrading to Professional or Business tiers
• On-premise deployment requires in-house Linux/PostgreSQL administration capability

Hive

Pros

• Flexible switching between Gantt, Kanban, table and calendar views on shared data
• Native chat and email reduce the need for separate communication tools
• Generous free tier supports up to 10 members with unlimited tasks
• Transparent, relatively affordable per-user pricing compared to some competitors
• 14-day free trial with full features and no credit card required

Cons

• Free plan storage is limited to 200MB, restrictive for file-heavy teams
• Advanced features like time tracking and portfolios require the higher Teams tier
• Enterprise pricing is not publicly listed and requires a sales conversation
• Smaller integration marketplace than larger competitors like Asana or Monday.com
• AI Assistant is gated behind paid Starter tier and above

Teamwork

Pros

• Combines project management with native time tracking and invoicing, reducing the need for separate billing tools
• Strong fit for agencies and client-services teams managing many concurrent projects and budgets
• Multiple project views (Gantt, board, list, table) suit different planning styles on the same data
• Resource and capacity planning tools help prevent team over-allocation
• Generous free tier for very small teams to evaluate the platform

Cons

• Per-user pricing can get expensive for larger teams once advanced features are needed
• Some advanced features such as CRM integration and multi-currency budgeting are locked behind custom-priced Optimize and Enterprise tiers
• Automation actions are capped by plan, which can be limiting for heavy automation users on lower tiers
• Interface has a learning curve for teams new to full-featured project management software
• Mobile app is generally reported as less capable than the desktop web experience

Celoxis

• Enterprise Portfolio & PMO Management — PMOs use Celoxis' analytics, dashboards, and what-if scenarios to plan and monitor portfolios of projects across an organization.
• Data-Sensitive On-Premise Deployment — Organizations with data residency or security requirements install Celoxis on-premise instead of using a cloud-only alternative.

Hive

• Cross-functional project management — Marketing, product and operations teams use Hive's flexible views to plan and track projects across departments in one workspace.
• Agency and creative workflows — Creative and marketing agencies use Hive's proofing, approval and forms features to manage client deliverables and intake requests.
• Remote team collaboration — Distributed teams use Hive's native chat and email integration to coordinate work without switching between separate communication tools.

Teamwork

• Agency client delivery — Agencies use Teamwork.com to plan client projects, track billable hours against budgets, and invoice clients directly from tracked time.
• Software and IT consultancy delivery — Consultancies track project scope, resource allocation, and profitability across multiple concurrent client engagements.
• Internal cross-functional project management — Teams use Gantt and board views to plan internal initiatives, track dependencies, and manage team capacity without client billing.