Huly vs Kanboard vs Shortcut

Huly and Kanboard are both open source and self-hostable, but Huly bundles issue tracking with docs, chat, and video into one connected workspace while…

Huly

Freemium · From Free

Best for: Teams wanting a self-hosted, all-in-one alternative that replaces separate issue tracking, docs, chat, and video tools.

Kanboard

Open Source · From Free

Best for: Developers and sysadmins who want the lightest possible self-hosted kanban board with no paid tiers.

Shortcut

Freemium, per-user subscription · From Free (up to 10 users); paid plans from $8.50/user/month billed annually

Best for: Software teams that want a polished managed SaaS tool with sprint planning and native GitHub or GitLab workflows.

At a Glance

 HulyKanboardShortcut
Primary categoryProject ManagementProject ManagementProject Management
RatingNot documentedNot documentedNot documented
Pricing modelFreemiumOpen SourceFreemium, per-user subscription
Starting priceFreeFreeFree (up to 10 users); paid plans from $8.50/user/month billed annually
Free planYesYesYes
Free trialNot documentedNot documentedYes
PlatformsWebWebNot documented
Team collaborationNot documentedNot documentedNot documented
AI featuresNot documentedNot documentedYes
Public APIYesYesYes

Standout Differences

Open source and self-hostable

Huly and Kanboard can both be deployed on a team's own infrastructure at no licensing cost, an option Shortcut does not offer.

Huly, Kanboard

All-in-one workspace

Huly combines issue tracking, docs, chat, and video conferencing in a single connected data model, replacing several separate tools.

Huly

Minimal, lightweight footprint

Kanboard is a deliberately feature-light PHP and SQLite application that runs on modest hardware without extra modules to configure.

Kanboard

Sprint-style Iterations for software teams

Shortcut organizes work into Iterations with velocity tracking, a planning structure purpose-built for engineering teams.

Shortcut

Native GitHub and GitLab sync

Huly and Shortcut both offer two-way issue and pull request synchronization with GitHub, tying project tracking directly to code.

Huly, Shortcut

Feature-by-Feature

Deployment and Openness

FeatureHulyKanboardShortcut
Self-hosted deploymentAvailableAvailableUnavailable
Open-source codebaseAvailableAvailableUnavailable

Collaboration Modules

FeatureHulyKanboardShortcut
Built-in docs or knowledge baseAvailableNot documentedAvailable
Built-in chat or video conferencingAvailableNot documentedNot documented

Development Workflow

FeatureHulyKanboardShortcut
Sprint or iteration planningNot documentedNot documentedAvailable
Native GitHub two-way syncAvailableNot documentedAvailable

Pricing

FeatureHulyKanboardShortcut
Usable free tierAvailableAvailableAvailable
Published per-user SaaS pricingUnavailableUnavailableAvailable

Pricing Compared

Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.

Huly

Common — Free N/A
Rare — $19.99/month monthly, flat rate
Epic — $99.99/month monthly, flat rate
Legendary — $399.99/month monthly, flat rate

Kanboard

Self-Hosted (Open Source) — Free N/A
Managed Hosting (third-party) — From approximately $14/month monthly

Shortcut

Free — $0 Monthly (up to 10 users)
Team — $8.50/user/month Billed annually
Business — $12/user/month Billed annually
Enterprise — Contact sales Custom

Pros & Cons

Huly

Pros

  • Fully open source and self-hostable at no licensing cost
  • Combines issue tracking, docs, chat, and video in one connected tool
  • Unlimited users and objects on every plan, including free
  • Flat monthly pricing on hosted tiers rather than per-seat fees
  • Native GitHub integration for two-way issue and PR sync

Cons

  • Self-hosting requires meaningful infrastructure (recommended 16 GB RAM) and DevOps knowledge
  • Smaller company and community than Linear, Jira, or Notion
  • Hosted cloud availability has been in flux as the company shifts focus toward self-hosting
  • UI and feature depth in each module (docs, chat, video) can lag best-in-class single-purpose tools
  • Documentation and third-party integration ecosystem are less mature than larger competitors

Kanboard

Pros

  • Completely free and open source with no feature paywalls
  • Lightweight PHP/SQLite stack is cheap and easy to self-host on modest hardware
  • Simple, distraction-free interface with a low learning curve
  • Full data ownership since nothing is stored on a vendor's servers
  • Extensible via a public API and community plugin ecosystem

Cons

  • No official cloud-hosted version from the maintainer, so self-hosting is required for zero cost
  • Development pace has slowed as the project sits in maintenance mode
  • Lacks built-in real-time collaboration features like chat or video calls
  • Mobile experience is a responsive web view rather than dedicated native apps
  • Requires basic server administration knowledge to install, secure, and back up

Shortcut

Pros

  • Purpose-built for software engineering teams rather than general project management
  • Simpler, faster interface than heavier tools like Jira
  • Generous free tier for teams up to 10 users
  • Transparent per-user pricing with no hidden enterprise-only paywalls at the Team/Business level
  • Strong native integrations with GitHub, GitLab, and Slack

Cons

  • Less suited to non-engineering teams than general-purpose PM tools like Asana
  • Fewer deep workflow customizations than enterprise-grade tools like Jira
  • Mobile app is less mature than the web application
  • Reporting depth trails some larger, more established competitors
  • Enterprise pricing is not published and requires a sales conversation

Use Cases

Choose Huly: Teams wanting a self-hosted, all-in-one alternative that replaces separate issue tracking, docs, chat, and video tools.
Choose Kanboard: Developers and sysadmins who want the lightest possible self-hosted kanban board with no paid tiers.
Choose Shortcut: Software teams that want a polished managed SaaS tool with sprint planning and native GitHub or GitLab workflows.

Huly

  • Software development project management — Engineering teams track issues, sprints, and pull requests in one tool tied directly to docs and chat.
  • Startup all-in-one workspace — Small teams replace several separate SaaS subscriptions (issue tracker, docs, chat, video) with one connected platform.
  • Self-hosted, privacy-conscious deployments — Organizations that must keep data on their own infrastructure self-host the full open-source stack.

Kanboard

  • Solo developer task tracking — A developer self-hosts Kanboard on a home server or VPS to track personal coding projects without paying for a SaaS subscription.
  • Small technical team workflow — A small engineering or IT team runs Kanboard behind their VPN to manage sprints and support tickets with LDAP-based single sign-on.
  • Privacy-conscious project management — Organizations with strict data residency or compliance requirements self-host Kanboard to keep all task data on infrastructure they control.

Shortcut

  • Agile sprint planning — Plan and track sprint-based work using Iterations and Kanban Workflows.
  • Cross-team roadmap and OKR tracking — Connect engineering execution to company-level objectives and roadmaps.
  • Developer-centric bug and issue tracking — Track bugs and technical work with native GitHub and GitLab integration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can all three of these be self-hosted?

Huly and Kanboard can both be self-hosted for free using Docker. Shortcut is SaaS only and does not offer a self-hosted deployment option.

Which of the three is the lightest weight to run?

Kanboard, since it runs on a simple PHP and SQLite stack with minimal server requirements compared to Huly's multi-service architecture.

Does Huly include built-in video calls?

Yes. Huly includes native audio and video conferencing rooms as part of its all-in-one workspace, alongside chat and docs.

Which tool is built specifically for software teams' sprints?

Shortcut, through its Iterations feature, which provides sprint-style planning cycles with velocity and progress tracking.

Is there a free option for each tool?

Yes. Huly offers a free hosted plan and free self-hosting, Kanboard is entirely free to self-host, and Shortcut has a free plan for teams up to 10 users.

Which tools integrate natively with GitHub for two-way issue sync?

Huly and Shortcut both document native two-way GitHub issue and pull request synchronization; Kanboard offers GitHub login but not issue sync.

Read the full Huly review · Read the full Kanboard review · Read the full Shortcut review