Dify vs Flowise vs Langflow

Dify, Flowise, and Langflow all let teams visually build LLM applications, RAG pipelines, and multi-agent workflows instead of writing orchestration code by…

Dify

Freemium/Subscription + Open Source self-hosted · From Free (Sandbox); self-hosted Community edition also free

Best for: Teams that want an all-in-one, model-agnostic LLM app platform combining workflow building, retrieval-augmented generation, and agents without stitching together separate tools.

Flowise

Freemium (free open-source self-hosting plus a paid Flowise Cloud with free, Starter, Pro, and Enterprise tiers) · From Free (self-hosted or Cloud Free plan); paid Cloud plans start at $35/month

Best for: Developers who want the broadest catalog of LLM, embedding, and vector store integrations, plus human-in-the-loop multi-agent flows.

Langflow

Open Source · From Free (self-hosted, MIT license); Langflow Cloud from about $25/month

Best for: Developers who want to prototype visually and then export clean Python code, backed by a large community and IBM's long-term support.

At a Glance

 DifyFlowiseLangflow
Primary categoryAIAIAI
RatingNot documentedNot documentedNot documented
Pricing modelFreemium/Subscription + Open Source self-hostedFreemium (free open-source self-hosting plus a paid Flowise Cloud with free, Starter, Pro, and Enterprise tiers)Open Source
Starting priceFree (Sandbox); self-hosted Community edition also freeFree (self-hosted or Cloud Free plan); paid Cloud plans start at $35/monthFree (self-hosted, MIT license); Langflow Cloud from about $25/month
Free planYesYesYes
Free trialYesNot documentedNot documented
PlatformsWebWebWeb
Team collaborationNot documentedNot documentedNot documented
AI featuresYesYesYes
Public APIYesYesYes

Standout Differences

Langflow bridges prototyping and production code

Every visual flow in Langflow can be exported as raw Python code, letting developers move from a drag-and-drop prototype to hand-tuned production code without a rewrite.

Langflow

Flowise offers the widest integration catalog

Flowise's integration catalog spans over 100 connectors across LLM providers, embedding models, and vector databases, making it the most broadly connected of the three right out of the box.

Flowise

Dify bundles the full LLM app stack

Dify combines a visual workflow builder, RAG pipeline, and agent framework in one product, reducing the need to stitch together separate tools for retrieval, orchestration, and agents.

Dify

Corporate backing differs across the three

Dify remains an independent, venture-backed startup, Flowise's team was acquired by Workday, and Langflow now carries IBM's backing following the DataStax acquisition, which shapes how each project's long-term roadmap may evolve.

Dify, Flowise, Langflow

All three are free to self-host

Dify, Flowise, and Langflow each publish an open-source core that teams can self-host at no license cost, though Dify's license carries some restrictions on multi-tenant SaaS resale that the others don't share.

Dify, Flowise, Langflow

Feature-by-Feature

Core Building Blocks

FeatureDifyFlowiseLangflow
Visual drag-and-drop flow builderAvailableAvailableAvailable
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipelineAvailableAvailableAvailable
Multi-agent orchestrationAvailableAvailableAvailable
Export visual flow to raw codeNot documentedNot documentedAvailable

Deployment and Licensing

FeatureDifyFlowiseLangflow
Self-hosted open-source coreAvailableAvailableAvailable
Free hosted cloud tierAvailableAvailableAvailable

Enterprise and Ecosystem

FeatureDifyFlowiseLangflow
Model Context Protocol (MCP) supportNot documentedNot documentedAvailable
Enterprise SSO and role-based access controlAvailableAvailableAvailable

Pricing Compared

Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.

Dify

Sandbox — Free N/A
Professional — $59/month (~$590/year annual) Monthly or Annual
Team — $159/month (~$1,590/year annual) Monthly or Annual
Community (self-hosted) — Free N/A
Enterprise — Custom Annual (quote-based)

Flowise

Free — Free N/A
Starter — $35/month monthly
Pro — $65/month monthly
Enterprise — Custom annual (negotiated)
Open Source (Self-Hosted) — Free N/A

Langflow

Open Source (Self-Hosted) — Free Free (MIT license)
Langflow Cloud Free Tier — Free Free
Langflow Cloud Paid — From about $25/month Monthly
Enterprise (IBM Elite Support) — Custom pricing Custom / annual contract

Pros & Cons

Dify

Pros

  • Genuinely open-source and self-hostable core, avoiding vendor lock-in
  • Model-agnostic support across all major LLM providers
  • Integrated RAG and agent stack reduces the need to stitch together separate tools
  • Accessible visual builder usable by both developers and less technical team members

Cons

  • Cloud plan message-credit limits can be restrictive for high-volume production apps
  • Open-source license includes restrictions on certain multi-tenant SaaS resale use cases
  • Enterprise-grade governance features require custom, quote-based pricing
  • Younger company (founded 2023) with a smaller support ecosystem than established players like LangChain

Flowise

Pros

  • Free and open source under the permissive Apache 2.0 license, with no-cost self-hosting available on any infrastructure.
  • Visual, drag-and-drop interface lowers the barrier to building RAG chatbots and multi-agent systems compared to writing LangChain code by hand.
  • Broad integration coverage across more than 100 LLMs, embedding models, and vector databases.
  • Supports both simple chatbots and more complex, coordinated multi-agent workflows with human-in-the-loop review.

Cons

  • Flowise Cloud subscription prices do not include LLM token usage, so real production costs can run well above the listed plan price once model API bills are added.
  • Self-hosting requires comfort with Docker and cloud infrastructure, which adds setup and maintenance overhead for non-technical teams.
  • Enterprise pricing is not published and must be negotiated directly with sales, making budgeting harder for larger deployments.
  • As a very small, now Workday-owned team historically, long-term open-source roadmap priorities may increasingly reflect Workday's enterprise product needs rather than the broader community's.

Langflow

Pros

  • Fully open source and free under the MIT license, with no forced paid tier for core functionality
  • Visual canvas makes RAG and agent prototyping accessible to non-expert developers
  • Ability to export to raw Python code bridges the gap between prototyping and production
  • Large and fast-growing GitHub community with over 150,000 stars
  • Backed by IBM's resources following the DataStax acquisition, aiding long-term maintenance

Cons

  • Real-world costs still come from LLM API usage, vector databases, and infrastructure, which are not included in the free software
  • Self-hosted deployments require managing servers, scaling, and monitoring without a managed cloud plan
  • Visual flows can become difficult to manage for very complex, large-scale agent architectures
  • Ownership changes (Logspace to DataStax to IBM) may raise questions about long-term product direction for some adopters
  • Langflow Cloud does not publish a detailed public pricing page beyond a reported starting price

Use Cases

Choose Dify: Teams that want an all-in-one, model-agnostic LLM app platform combining workflow building, retrieval-augmented generation, and agents without stitching together separate tools.
Choose Flowise: Developers who want the broadest catalog of LLM, embedding, and vector store integrations, plus human-in-the-loop multi-agent flows.
Choose Langflow: Developers who want to prototype visually and then export clean Python code, backed by a large community and IBM's long-term support.

Dify

  • Internal knowledge-base chatbots — Teams build RAG-based assistants that answer questions grounded in private company documents.
  • Customer support automation — Companies build AI agents and chatbots that handle customer inquiries using Dify's workflow builder.
  • AI SaaS product development — Independent developers and startups build and ship AI-powered SaaS products on top of Dify's orchestration layer.

Flowise

  • Rapid RAG chatbot prototyping — Developers connect a document loader, vector store, and chat model on the Flowise canvas to stand up a retrieval-augmented chatbot over internal knowledge bases in minutes rather than writing custom LangChain code.
  • Internal enterprise AI assistants — Product and IT teams use Flowise's Chatflows and Agentflows to build customer-support bots, internal knowledge assistants, and multi-step business process agents that plug into existing enterprise data sources.
  • Governed, large-scale agent deployment — Large organizations use Flowise's Enterprise tier, with SSO/SAML, RBAC, audit logging, and on-premises deployment, to design, launch, and govern AI agents at scale across regulated business units.

Langflow

  • Rapid RAG chatbot prototyping — Developers visually assemble retrieval-augmented generation pipelines to quickly prototype chatbots grounded in custom data.
  • Multi-agent workflow design — Teams build coordinated multi-agent systems where specialized agents handle different parts of a complex task.
  • Low-code to production handoff — Organizations prototype AI workflows visually, then export the generated Python code for hardening into a production application.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is best for RAG-heavy applications?

All three support retrieval-augmented generation, but they approach it differently: Dify automatically chunks, embeds, and indexes documents as part of its integrated stack; Flowise offers RAG-enabled Chatflows pulling from PDFs, spreadsheets, and websites; and Langflow treats RAG pipeline design as a core, prebuilt part of its component library.

Can I export a visual flow to code I can maintain by hand?

Yes, but only with Langflow, which lets you export any visual flow as raw Python code. Dify and Flowise don't document an equivalent code-export capability.

Which has the largest integration library?

Flowise. It plugs natively into more than 100 integrations spanning LLM providers, embedding models, and vector stores - covering names such as Pinecone, Weaviate, Chroma, OpenAI, and Anthropic among them.

Are these tools really free to self-host?

Yes, all three publish an open-source core that can be self-hosted at no license cost: Dify under its own Dify Open Source License (with some multi-tenant SaaS resale restrictions), Flowise under Apache 2.0, and Langflow under MIT.

Who backs the long-term development of each project?

Dify is an independent, venture-backed startup founded in 2023. Flowise's team was acquired by Workday. Langflow has moved from Logspace to DataStax to IBM, and now carries IBM's resources following that acquisition.

Read the full Dify review · Read the full Flowise review · Read the full Langflow review