Ackee vs Litlyx vs Medama Analytics

Ackee, Litlyx, and Medama Analytics are all cookieless, privacy-first alternatives to Google Analytics built for developers who want to self-host and own…

Ackee

Free (open source) · From Free

Best for: Developers who already run Node.js and MongoDB infrastructure and want a free, cookie-free multi-site dashboard with a GraphQL API for custom integrations.

Litlyx

Freemium / Subscription (self-hosted free option available) · From Free (self-hosted) or from EUR 8.99/month (Mini cloud plan)

Best for: Agencies, freelancers, and small businesses that want a fast-to-set-up, GDPR-compliant analytics tool with AI-generated client reports and the option to self-host for free.

Medama Analytics

Open Source · From Free

Best for: Developers and small-to-medium site operators who want the lightest possible self-hosted footprint, running as a single dependency-free binary with minimal server resources.

At a Glance

 AckeeLitlyxMedama Analytics
Primary categoryAnalyticsAnalyticsAnalytics
RatingNot documentedNot documentedNot documented
Pricing modelFree (open source)Freemium / Subscription (self-hosted free option available)Open Source
Starting priceFreeFree (self-hosted) or from EUR 8.99/month (Mini cloud plan)Free
Free planNot documentedYesNot documented
Free trialNot documentedNot documentedNot documented
PlatformsWebNot documentedNot documented
Team collaborationNot documentedNot documentedNot documented
AI featuresNot documentedYesNot documented
Public APIYesYesYes

Standout Differences

Free and open source at the core

All three tools offer a fully free, self-hosted path with no vendor subscription required, appealing to teams that want to avoid recurring analytics costs entirely.

Ackee, Litlyx, Medama Analytics

Cookieless by design

Each tool avoids cookies and personal identifiers, which means sites can typically skip a cookie-consent banner for analytics purposes and stay closer to GDPR compliance out of the box.

Ackee, Litlyx, Medama Analytics

Only Litlyx offers a managed cloud plan

Litlyx is the only one of the three with an official hosted SaaS tier, starting at EUR 8.99 per month, so teams that do not want to manage their own servers have a supported option.

Litlyx

AI-generated reporting sets Litlyx apart

Litlyx layers AI-powered, one-click reports and conversion funnel analysis on top of standard traffic metrics, a feature neither Ackee nor Medama Analytics offers.

Litlyx

Minimal infrastructure footprint

Medama Analytics ships as a single dependency-free binary that the project says can run on as little as 256MB of memory, making it the lightest self-hosting option of the three.

Medama Analytics

Feature-by-Feature

Core Tracking

FeatureAckeeLitlyxMedama Analytics
Cookie-free trackingAvailableAvailableAvailable
Custom event trackingAvailableAvailableNot documented
Conversion funnel analysisUnavailableAvailableUnavailable

Deployment and Access

FeatureAckeeLitlyxMedama Analytics
Self-hosted deploymentAvailableAvailableAvailable
Managed hosted (SaaS) planUnavailableAvailableUnavailable
Documented API for integrationsAvailableNot documentedAvailable

Reporting and Collaboration

FeatureAckeeLitlyxMedama Analytics
AI-generated reportsUnavailableAvailableUnavailable
Multi-site or multi-workspace dashboardAvailableAvailableNot documented
Shareable client-facing reportsUnavailableAvailableUnavailable

Pricing Compared

Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.

Ackee

Self-Hosted (Open Source) — Free

Litlyx

Mini — EUR 8.99/month Annual
Basic — EUR 14.99/month Annual
Pro — EUR 29.99/month Annual
Self-Hosted — Free N/A

Medama Analytics

Open Source (Self-Hosted) — Free N/A

Pros & Cons

Ackee

Pros

  • Completely free and open source
  • No cookies required, simplifying consent/compliance concerns
  • Full data ownership since it's self-hosted
  • Multiple deployment options to fit different infrastructure

Cons

  • Requires self-hosting and ongoing maintenance (no managed cloud version)
  • Requires running and maintaining a MongoDB database
  • Minimal feature set compared to full-featured commercial analytics suites

Litlyx

Pros

  • Cookieless and GDPR-compliant by design, avoiding consent-banner overhead
  • AI-generated reports save time for agencies producing recurring client summaries
  • Both hosted and self-hosted deployment options available
  • Very fast, low-friction setup compared to Google Analytics
  • Competitive, transparent pricing for small sites and agencies

Cons

  • Very young company founded in late 2024, with limited operating track record
  • Small team of under 10 employees may limit support responsiveness at scale
  • Feature set is less mature than long-established analytics platforms
  • Pageview-based pricing tiers can become costly for high-traffic sites
  • Some advanced product-analytics features lag behind dedicated tools like PostHog

Medama Analytics

Pros

  • Completely free and open source
  • No cookies or IP address storage, simplifying privacy compliance
  • Very lightweight tracker script with minimal performance impact
  • Low infrastructure requirements make self-hosting inexpensive
  • Fully documented OpenAPI REST API for custom integrations

Cons

  • No official managed hosting or SaaS plan, requires self-hosting expertise
  • Smaller community and ecosystem compared to Umami or Plausible
  • Documentation and long-term support depend on an open-source community rather than a company
  • Feature set is more limited than commercial, full-featured analytics platforms
  • No confirmed enterprise support or SLA options

Use Cases

Choose Ackee: Developers who already run Node.js and MongoDB infrastructure and want a free, cookie-free multi-site dashboard with a GraphQL API for custom integrations.
Choose Litlyx: Agencies, freelancers, and small businesses that want a fast-to-set-up, GDPR-compliant analytics tool with AI-generated client reports and the option to self-host for free.
Choose Medama Analytics: Developers and small-to-medium site operators who want the lightest possible self-hosted footprint, running as a single dependency-free binary with minimal server resources.

Ackee

  • Privacy-first site analytics — Site owners who want visitor insights without cookie banners or third-party data sharing.
  • Self-hosted analytics for multiple projects — Developers running several sites who want one dashboard without per-site SaaS fees.

Litlyx

  • Agency multi-client reporting — Digital agencies use Litlyx's multi-workspace support and AI-generated reports to manage analytics for many client sites and produce branded client reports quickly.
  • Privacy-first GA4 replacement — Small and mid-size businesses migrate from Google Analytics to Litlyx to achieve GDPR compliance and skip cookie consent banners.
  • Self-hosted analytics for developers — Developers deploy the open-source Docker version of Litlyx to keep full control of visitor data on their own infrastructure at no cost.

Medama Analytics

  • Privacy-compliant website analytics — Site owners use Medama to measure traffic without collecting cookies or IP addresses, easing GDPR and PECR compliance.
  • Self-hosted analytics for small infrastructure — Developers deploy Medama on low-resource VMs or containers to avoid the cost and complexity of larger analytics platforms.
  • Custom analytics integrations — Teams use Medama's OpenAPI-documented REST API to pull visitor data into internal dashboards or tools.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are Ackee, Litlyx, and Medama Analytics really free to use?

Yes, all three can be used entirely free if self-hosted. Ackee and Medama Analytics only exist as free, open-source, self-hosted software with no official paid tier. Litlyx also offers a free self-hosted option, but additionally sells a hosted cloud plan starting at EUR 8.99 per month for teams that prefer not to manage their own servers.

Which of these tools requires the least server maintenance?

Litlyx's hosted cloud plans require no server maintenance at all since Litlyx runs the infrastructure. Among the self-hosted-only options, Medama Analytics is designed to be the lightest to run, shipping as a single dependency-free binary that the project says can operate on as little as 256MB of memory, compared to Ackee which requires running and maintaining a MongoDB database.

Do any of these tools require a cookie consent banner?

No. Ackee, Litlyx, and Medama Analytics are all designed to track visitors without cookies or persistent identifiers, which is intended to let site owners avoid a cookie-consent banner for analytics purposes and align more easily with regulations like GDPR.

Which tool is best for an agency managing multiple client websites?

Litlyx is the most purpose-built for agencies, offering multi-domain workspaces and shareable, branded client reports along with AI-generated summaries. Ackee also supports monitoring multiple sites from one dashboard, though without the AI reporting or client-facing report templates that Litlyx provides.

Does any of these tools offer AI-powered analytics reports?

Litlyx is the only one of the three with AI-generated reporting, offering one-click summaries of web, product, SEO, and marketing performance on its paid plans. Neither Ackee nor Medama Analytics documents any AI reporting features.

How mature are these projects compared to established alternatives like Google Analytics?

All three are smaller, newer projects than Google Analytics. Litlyx was founded in 2024 and is an early-stage startup backed by an accelerator program, while Ackee and Medama Analytics are community-maintained open-source projects without a company behind them, so buyers should weigh their lighter feature sets and smaller support ecosystems against their lower cost and stronger data privacy.

Read the full Ackee review · Read the full Litlyx review · Read the full Medama Analytics review